Washington – President Bush’s call for spending cuts to offset the cost of hurricane relief has sharply split the Republican Party, with small-government conservatives emboldened to scale back the overall reach of government while moderates drive for more anti-poverty spending, not less.
The rift is growing wider as Congress moves toward a late-October deadline to produce legislation saving at least $35 billion from social welfare and health care programs over the next five years.
That target was set this spring by a budget blueprint that narrowly passed Congress, largely along party lines.
Now, House Republican leaders, with Bush’s encouragement, hope to raise the target to $38.5 billion, while cutting billions more from other federal programs.
Some House conservatives say if they don’t get at least that much, they may revolt against the GOP leaders.
“I can tell you if we don’t see more than rhetoric, this leadership team is not secure,” said Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.
For moderate Republicans and Democrats, Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath proved the need for more government, not less. Calls for austerity in other anti-poverty programs to pay for hurricane relief have elicited major protests – especially since nearly $300 billion in emergency spending on the war in Iraq has never been offset by cuts in other areas or tax increases.
“There’s this pent-up feeling that we’ve been working too hard on the president’s agenda and not enough on what we want,” said Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., an outspoken moderate.
After nearly five years of budget busting, the rush of spending since Katrina struck the Gulf Coast has awakened Congress’ interest in controlling the budget deficit.
With $71 billion in Katrina-related spending and tax cuts passed so far, a deficit projected to be around $314 billion for the fiscal year that began this month could be pushed toward $400 billion.
To stem that tide, House Budget Committee chairman Jim Nussle, R-Iowa, on Wednesday proposed increasing the $35 billion entitlement savings target by 10 percent, to $38.5 billion, while imposing a 2 percent across-the-board cut to federal programs subject to Congress’s annual spending bills.
That “haircut” would produce $16 billion in savings, still far short of the hurricane relief already approved.
“This is a down payment,” he said. “This is not making that much of a dent in the total amount that will be needed to deal with all the proposals in their totality for the gulf.”
