ap

Skip to content
A Palestinian protester grabs a gate during a demonstration Friday against Israel's high wall in the West Bank village of Bilin, near Ramallah. Israel claims the miles-long barrier is needed for its security, but Palestinians consider it a land grab.
A Palestinian protester grabs a gate during a demonstration Friday against Israel’s high wall in the West Bank village of Bilin, near Ramallah. Israel claims the miles-long barrier is needed for its security, but Palestinians consider it a land grab.
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your player ready...

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration laid out a bold shift in its Mideast peace strategy Friday, stepping up pressure on Israel and the Palestinians to resume stalled talks by moving immediately to negotiations on the toughest issues dividing them, such as the borders of a Palestinian state and the status of Jerusalem.

On its face, a move to tackle those two defining and difficult issues that Israel has long refused to budge on would appear to be a major turnaround in long-standing American policy to push for incremental Mideast progress.

But U.S. officials stressed that the shift does not abandon the administration’s comprehensive approach to peace and said their overall aim is to get the parties beyond daily disagreements and back to the table, where all issues would be discussed.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that dealing with those matters first would eliminate Palestinian concerns about continued construction of Jewish settlements in disputed areas.

After a meeting at the State Department, Clinton and Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh called for negotiations to begin as soon as possible and be bound by deadlines.

“Resolving borders resolves settlements, resolving Jerusalem resolves settlements,” Clinton said. “I think we need to lift our sights and instead of being looking down at the trees, we need to look at the forest.”

Peace efforts in the past have tended to focus on broader issues, including Israeli settlements, the fate of Palestinian refugees, and water, with the even more contentious matters such as borders and Jerusalem being left for so-called final status talks.

Previous attempts to concentrate on the larger issues have ended in failure, notably the 2000 Camp David talks shepherded by former President Bill Clinton. At the end of the Clinton administration and through the eight years that George W. Bush occupied the White House, U.S. officials shot for nuanced progress on more modest matters.

On Friday, Judeh lent support to the new U.S. tack.

“If you resolve the question of borders, then you automatically resolve not only settlements and Jerusalem, but you identify the nature on the ground of the two-state solution and (what) it looks like,” Judeh said.

Both Clinton and Judeh spoke out against new Israeli housing construction in east Jerusalem, which the Palestinians claim as their capital, saying it was damaging to the process.

Clinton said the administration wanted a resolution that meets both the Palestinian goal of a clearly defined and viable state based on the borders that existed before the 1967 war “with agreed swaps” and the Israeli goal of security within boundaries that “reflect subsequent developments.”

RevContent Feed

More in News