I love the I love the efficiency of it. I love
I love the things that fold out from the wall, and who doesn’t love miniature things. But when I think about it for my lifestyle, it would be darling — for about the first week.
Then, after tripping over my family, I’d start thinking about or maybe a new house.
When I was in architecture school, I had a professor by the name of Kaya Arikoglu. He would say, “You can’t afford the mansion, but you might be able to afford one room of that mansion.” I love that philosophy — it really works, and I have used it over and over again throughout my architectural career.
About 14 years ago, I designed our vacation home on a pretty tight budget and I used this philosophy. Yes, I had to make sacrifices — I couldn’t have the grand kitchen, the palatial bathroom, the separate dining room, the to-die-for master bedroom. I had to make the decision that one room, “the great room,” was the priority and everything else was subordinate to that idea.
I had to use a simple structure (think barn). You will save a lot of money using a simple structure. Quite simply, that is why barns have always been built that way. Their owners wanted a lot of space — for little money. That’s what my just-now-named “not-quite-so-tiny house movement” wants, too.
When I went to a mason to get a bid on my house project, he said, “Why do you want the footprint so small — I’ve built garages bigger than that!” The answer was simple, I didn’t have the money to make it bigger.
But what I knew was that it would live large, because I wouldn’t divide the space into little compartments like most homebuilders do. The enemy of tiny houses is interior separation walls.
Yes, it is important to close off the bathroom and maybe the bedroom, but everything else has to share the great space or it won’t be a great space because the budget will be eaten up by all of those rooms.
Let’s just say, for argument, that an average dining room is about 14 by 14 feet; a small kitchen is 14 by 10 feet; a small living room is 14 by 16 feet. If you add those all together, you get a room that is 14 by 40 feet — a pretty good-sized room.
Height is also really important in making this a truly great space. Eight feet is OK in small rooms, but when the room expands in plan it needs to expand in height, too.
My “great space” has a sleeping loft above, which is separate enough that it feels secluded from the first floor; a small bathroom and a kitchen off the dining area. The walls of the bathroom and kitchen do not go all the way up, so that you feel like the entire footprint of the house is all one room.
The other thing I did to maximize the space was to use lots of windows. That way I get to steal the exterior space, too, for my house. I’ve always thought that a great way to expand a small house was to make the edge of the property provide the privacy for the house — say, have a fence and dense evergreens line the edge of the property (or maybe just the back yard) or just get a big piece of property, as in my case.
Then build the house with lots of French doors and windows, so that one can see right out to the edge of the property. Now the house is just made up of interior and exterior rooms.
And the best news of all is that this design philosophy doesn’t just work for new construction. It works for renovation, too.
Architects are adept at manipulating the current layout of a space, which can really expand the spatial feeling of an existing house.
By just tearing down a few walls and ceilings (I love reclaiming attic space) and connecting the interior visually with the exterior, one can
