This isa banner year for the Denver metro transit system, with the opening of four rail lines serving places fromWheat Ridge to the airport and the Flatiron Flyer rapid bus route to Boulder.
But don’tcall Denver a transit-rich city — not yet.Beyondthe shiny trains that ferry suburban commuters to downtown andTech Center jobs,andsports fans to games, the core city itself still struggles with transit gaps.

Largely rootedin abus network that isspread too thin, those shortcomingsmake travel between some of Denver’s most urban neighborhoods, job centers, recreation spots and nightlife districts cumbersomeor downrightunmanageable. Closer to the city limits, especially in east Denver neighborhoods that are miles from new and upcomingrail lines, transit access flickers.
Transit advocates point to Cherry Creek, home to high-paying desk jobs and even morelower-paying restaurant, hotel and retail jobs,as a big missed opportunity for a transit hub. Instead, it’s an area where severalbus routes simply pass through. Many of those employees live in northeast Denver, notes Stuart Anderson of the nonprofit group Transportation Solutions.
“If you look at transit from there to the shopping center, it’s ridiculous,” he said. “You’ve got to take the 15(on Colfax Avenue) to the 40, and then you’re stuck on Colorado Boulevard, and you’ve still got to getto Cherry Creek. It just isn’t served very well.”
Connections between Cherry Creek and downtown’s Union Station, where most of the rail lines go, similarly frustrate potential riders, despite years of pushing from Cherry Creek business leaders for a direct downtownshuttle.
Several riders who contactedThe Denver Post for this story also cited myriad transit frustrations extending to mostparts of the city: the need for more frequent service; lower fares; more routes designed on a grid instead of being geared to feed into downtown or rail lines; and circulator buses connecting common destinationsin neighborhoods.
But publictransportation advocates and riders see promise in recent moves by Denver city officials to take the reins — or at least share the wheel with the Regional Transportation District — when it comes to the city’s transit destiny, even if the question of how to pay for more expansions remains unanswered.
This summer, city officialskicked off , which officials say will draw on traditionaland innovative ideas.Thatfollows on groundwork Denverhas laid for its first project: the potential transformationof Colfax Avenue by 2022into a bus rapid transit corridor, with more frequent and faster streetcarlike service indedicated lanes during rush hour and fewer set stops.
Technological advancesalso give hope to some that Denver can improve transit access within the city. In someU.S. cities, especially those with cash-strapped transit agencies, partnerships with private companies are testing outdynamic routing. That technology relies on computer algorithms to buildcustomized routes for smaller buses or vansbased on where passengers need to go.
Such progress hasbeen a long time coming, both forthose who depend on transit to get around the city and a potential legion ofwould-be riders who want to ditch their cars more often. The latter group includes the and some empty-nesters who have been flocking to the growing city, drawn by the appeal of an urban lifestyle.
After Kathryn Cuddihee, 28,moved to Denver three years ago with her husband, she gavetransit a go to get to her social work job in Centennial. The Uptown residentstuck with it for a year and a half, she said, walking to a light rail stop downtown and then schlepping a mile on Arapahoe Road after getting off on the other end.
But she gave up and began driving, in part becausefares shotup to $9 roundtrip, making transitless economical. Closer tohome,she’s frustrated at the hassle and transfers involved in what she thinks should be easytrips bybus to Cherry Creek or even nearby Capitol Hill.
“The buses are inconsistent, infrequent and limited, and it wouldbe nice to feel like we are living in a city that had rail dispersed throughout the various neighborhoods,” Cuddihee said.
Admittedly, she’s influenced by her experience: “Having lived in places like D.C. and Boston, it just does not compare to the systems there.”

Streets at capacity
Denver isn’t as big as those cities, and its railsystem is a newer, largely suburban commuter-focused system borne of RTD’s setup: It serves2,340 square miles in eight counties.
But as the city absorbs , many of them attracted to itsbooming economy from larger cities on the coasts, itcan’t help but invite such comparisons.
Advocates note that having thesingle regional agency carriesbenefits, particularly when it comestomarshaling theambitious$5.3 billion — which — and balancing transit needs in disparate places.
RTD , including the Free MallRide and newer Free MetroRide that traverse downtown.
But the metrowide system “hasalways been geared toward middle-class whiteworkers,” in the view ofAngie Rivera-Malpiede, a former RTD board member. She now is director of Northeast Transportation Connections, a Denver group that mostly focuses on helping low-income workers. “That was before millennials moved in. And the communities of the working poor got no incentives and were never looked at as a population to try to lure on the bus system.”
Officialsincluding Mayor Michael Hancock acknowledge that streets such as often-choked Colorado Boulevard can’t absorb much more traffic.
In his July 11 State of the City address, which ,he said his goal wasthat every resident would have“mobility freedom,” whether that meantaccess to morerobust transit options, bike- and car-sharing systems such as , or other alternatives to driving.
Amid — worsening traffic congestion everywhere — state and regional transportation planners, as well as RTD officials, also long have citedthe sameimperative.
“Do we need more bus service? Yes. Do we have the money to do it? No,” said Rivera-Malpiede, who also is vice president of the Stapleton Foundation. “I think that’s the crux that we have at this point.”
Denver city officials — and participants in its 18-month planning process — hope to face that challenge head-on.
The marks the first time in the modern era thecity has takenthe lead on a major transit project. For now, even as engineering is underway,funding for the $125 million to $135 millionproject isn’t pinned down. The city isworking with RTD and Aurora on financing, which will include seeking federal funds.
The plan calls forreconfiguringColfax for bus rapid transit, from the Auraria Campus through east Denver and possibly to the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora.It about the reduction of automobile capacity on Colfax that will result from the new bus line, which would supplant much of RTD’s 15 Limited route.
While the citywide planning effort begins, smaller studies areexamining the potential for improved bus access on several major streets in a more modest way, public worksofficials say.
Those include , along with possible tweaks to its rush-hour transit lane. Multimodal studies are looking atpotential improvements for Federal Boulevard from the north to south city limits and at Speer Boulevard/Leetsdale Drive through central and southeast Denver.

Figuring out costs
So far, the city is still grappling withwhether — and how — itmight step up to pay for transit system improvements benefiting its neighborhoods.
RTD welcomes any increased involvement from Denver, spokesman Nate Currey said. The transit agency’s focus in the near term, as it works to find ways to finish unfunded portions of several lines — including the $110 million central corridor light rail extension in Denver — will be on seekingpublic input and using its own analysis to improve the way thecurrent system works, he said. The goal: to attract more riders to what RTD has.
Thatwill happen largely within RTD’soperating budget, which was $467 million last year.
Upcominginitiatives should improve riders’ experience, Curreysaid, including a full rollout of its on all services, years after other big transit agencies began offering it.
Denver cityofficials, including transportation directorCrissy Fanganello, say the citywide transit planning effort will consider potential ways to foot the bill, but first its participants mustset priorities.
One option would betofollowin the footsteps of Boulder, which for two decades has “bought up” additional local bus service fromRTD as it built ridership for branded lines with names including HOP, SKIP, JUMP and BOUND. Last year, that city paid RTD about $500,000 to partially subsidize two routes, while Boulder County and the University of Colorado also bought up service. Englewood contributes toa circulator shuttle connecting businesses and hospitals to the Englewood light rail stop.
Or Denvercould, as ,create its own transit authority to supplement RTDservice. Independent of that, the city could seek voter approval for a supplemental transit sales tax on top of RTD’s 1 percent rate.
Fanganello isskeptical of the need for a city transit authority. Meanwhile, she and transit advocates — as well as council members — are big on exploring potential alternatives to new bus lines, especially optionsenabled by technology.
The city made one offering this year when it rolled out a new smart phone app, called , that allows users to compare routes and costs using public transit, driving, taxis, car-sharing services, bicycling and other modes of getting around.
“We’ll look at all the options” to pay for any potentialtransit initiatives, Fanganello said. “We need to identify what the problems are. What are the potential solutions, and what needs to be part of that conversation?”

Narrowing transitgaps
Nonprofit transit groups already have begun exploring ways to reduce gaps by providing transportation to and from light rail stations. In central Denver, Anderson’s group,Transportation Solutions,has pilot programs in the works that include providing subsidized rides on Lyft Line, a version of theride-sharing service that pools riders going the same way. The targets in one,a partnership with the University of Denver, will be students traveling to campus; and in another, peoplewho work a mile or two fromthe Colorado and I-25 station.
And the groupis working out a program with another provider to set up shared rides to the CherryCreek area, using pickup meeting points near where workers live in other parts of Denver, Anderson said. Elsewhere, Northeast Transportation Connections and Mile High Connects are among nonprofits similarlyworking on “first-mile/last-mile” transit solutions.
Another model that uses technology has been pursued by companies including Boston-based startup . Itexplored a launch in Denver but has held off amid uncertainty aboutRTD’s involvement and other logistics. InBoston, Washington and Kansas City, Mo., Bridj vehiclesshuttlecustomers betweenset service zones based on dynamic routes that a computer builds as users reserverides.
Soon Bridjwill expand to Austin, Texas.
“We’d been holding open a launch slot for Denver, but ended up deciding to use that launch slot in Austin due to the difference in expressed attitude towards mass transit innovation,” said Bridj CEO Matthew George. “We’re optimistic that we can work to change that in the coming months. We’dbe in Denver in a heartbeat if invited in by RTD and the city.”
Fornow,Robby Long, a 27-year-old resident of City Park West, relies more on his bike than the bus. He recently completeda master’sprogramin urban and regional planning and works as a fellow at Transportation Solutions.
While he creditsthe architects of RTD’s FasTracks planwithhaving the right vision to servemetro growth in the next 20 years, he says Denver is right to take on theColfax corridor plan and chart out acitywidetransit strategy.
“I don’t know what will come out of the plan,” he said, “but Ithink that’s a recognition that RTDis not going to provide the level of service that’s necessary to fill in the transit gaps in the city. Another entity will need to take that on in order to make it practical for thedensifyingurban cores.”
About the transportation series
This isthe final installment in aDenver Post series examining the ways that increased traffic congestion is affecting drivers and residents — as well as plans and potential changes that could ease the crunch and expand transportation options. Previous stories explored to the metro area in coming decades; emerging technologies, including self-driving vehicles, ; andthe Colorado Department of Transportation’s .



