ap

Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED:
Getting your player ready...
Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his case after a lower court ruled he was wrong in refusing to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple by citing his religious beliefs.
YourHub file
Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his case after a lower court ruled he was wrong in refusing to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple by citing his religious beliefs.

Last month, Lakewood cake baker Jack Phillips to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the court to give him and business owners like him permission to use their religious views as justification for allowing them to pick and choose which laws to follow.

Over the past eight years, my local photography business has collaborated with thousands of individuals, couples, families and businesses in Colorado and across this great country. We’ve linked up with couples and families of all stripes, start-up companies, mom-and-pop shops, and Fortune 500 businesses.

As small business owners, my wife and I strive to provide a service that is honest, artistic and open to everyone. The simple truth, though, is that providing commercial services to a particular customer doesn’t also necessarily mean that a business owner agrees with everything the customer does. It simply means they are providing a service to the public and they are open to everyone on the same terms. This is a wholly distinct paradigm from pursuing art projects outside the bounds of the commercial agora.

Colorado’s economy thrives — and our community benefits — when businesses follow the law and treat all customers fairly. As the owner of a company, I know what my personal beliefs are. Those beliefs don’t change just because our business is being commissioned to take photographs.

Thankfully, my business is already protected under existing laws. The idea that I should be able to refuse a customer simply because of who they are — regardless of whether they want a cake, a photo, or even emergency services — would open a dangerous can of worms for those who want to take advantage of the system.

Religious freedom is already protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution, and Colorado’s non-discrimination laws are working the way they were designed to work. If the Supreme Court allows business owners to use their religion to ignore laws they don’t like, it will give the unmistakable impression that Colorado is not open for business to everyone. Thatap bad for our economy, itap bad for prospective businesses thinking about moving here, and itap bad for our community.

As the spouse of a Russian immigrant and the son of a Cuban immigrant who came to this nation in search of liberty, my personal history is steeped in the understanding that we live in a republic that guarantees freedom, equal rights, and opportunity for all. These freedoms do not give any of us the right to deny services to others with whom we disagree.

Danny de Zayas is the co-founder of From the Hip Photo in Denver.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit or check out our for how to submit by e-mail or mail.

RevContent Feed

More in ap Columnists