ap

Skip to content

Lauren Boebert invites controversy again with vote against bone marrow registry

Colorado Republican U.S. House member says it adds to the national debt

FILE -- Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) speaks to supporters of President Donald Trump outside the Supreme Court in Washington during a rally to protest the results of the 2020 presidential election on Saturday, Dec. 12, 2020.  Boebert represents an increasingly clamorous faction of the Republican Party that carries Trump’s anti-establishment message and is ready to break all norms in doing so. (Stefani Reynolds/The New York Times)
FILE — Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) speaks to supporters of President Donald Trump outside the Supreme Court in Washington during a rally to protest the results of the 2020 presidential election on Saturday, Dec. 12, 2020. Boebert represents an increasingly clamorous faction of the Republican Party that carries Trump’s anti-establishment message and is ready to break all norms in doing so. (Stefani Reynolds/The New York Times)
DENVER, CO - FEBRUARY 21:  Justin Wingerter - Staff portraits at the Denver Post studio.  (Photo by Eric Lutzens/The Denver Post)
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your player ready...

U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert raised eyebrows Thursday night by a bill to reauthorize the , which matches leukemia and lymphoma patients with donors of bone marrow and cord blood.

The legislation passed the U.S. House by . Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican who doesn’t shy away from controversy, were the only nay votes.

Boebert’s office did not respond to a request for comment, but the Republican from Silt that she opposed the bill because it adds to the national debt, did not go through the committee process and was not analyzed by the Congressional Budget Office, the agency which determines how much money a bill will cost.

“I’m not voting for bills that don’t go through committee and add hundreds of millions of dollars to the national debt,” Boebert 岹.

The bill — , the TRANSPLANT Act — was passed under a suspension of the rules, a tactic commonly used for expediting uncontroversial legislation. All other members of Congress from Colorado, Democrat and Republican, voted for it.

“It is unconscionable that Congresswoman Boebert would stand in the way of cancer patients’ access to bone marrow transplants and the cancer-fighting properties they have,” Colorado Democratic Party spokesman David Pourshoushtari said.

Boebert, a hardline conservative, has voiced frustration in recent weeks at what she sees as political inaction on immigration and a flood of migrants at America’s southern border. She tweeted Friday that the frustration has influenced her votes.

“I’m done spending away our children’s future, voting on sesame seeds and whatever else Pelosi wants while we have a humanitarian crisis at our border,” Boebert .

She was referring to requiring food companies to label when a product has sesame seeds, to which an estimated 1.5 million Americans are allergic. The House passed the requirement by Boebert voted nay.

RevContent Feed

More in Politics