Editor’s note: This month, the two major candidates for president or their representatives respond to a Denver Post request for their plans on tackling four major issues. Today, Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain outline their platforms on national security and Iraq.
After perusing the foreign policy essays of both presidential candidates, one may wonder what all the fuss is about. Both offerings parallel each other in tone, substance and, for the most part, policy. Those who have followed the debate, however, appreciate that the distinctions between Barack Obama and John McCain are stark. It’s a debate about temperament, experience and judgment.
Obama lacks a sizeable resume on foreign affairs. He has staked his credibility on a decision to oppose the Iraq war in 2003. Obama is correct to point out that his decision was politically unpopular at the time — although taking a stand in Chicago while a member of the Illinois legislature held only modest risk.
In much the same way, McCain’s defining moment in recent years was his support for the surge. It is difficult to argue that the increase in troop levels in Iraq has produced results. But though McCain deserves much credit, he was hardly alone in supporting more boots on the grounds — and the failures of the administration demanded an alternative, any alternative.There are other conspicuous differences. Obama does not bring up “winning” or “victory” in Iraq, only withdrawal to focus on more pressing demands in Afghanistan. McCain stresses the importance of a return as victors and believes the two fronts are intricately linked. Obama states that the war was misguided to begin with, so for him, the central question is the initial decision to invade.
In a recent editorial board meeting with The Denver Post, McCain dismissed this debate and pointed out that the next president can’t change the past and will deal with the complexities of the present situation.
Both are correct. This is a debate about past decisions and prospective policy. Our security is challenged by terrorists, but also by Russia, energy independence and issues unknown. Both McCain and Obama have a long way to go to clarify how they would deal with these challenges.
David Harsanyi (dharsanyi@denverpost.com) is a Denver Post columnist.
