ap

Skip to content
PUBLISHED:
Getting your player ready...

Of the many tall tales spun by President Barack Obama during the State of the Union address this week, there is one, and perhaps only one, that most Americans believe to be true.

The old yarn goes something like this: A long time ago, the United States was an economic powerhouse. We built things with our hands and worked in factories and we loved it.

Our recent prosperity, on the other hand, was built on a house of cards — intellectual innovation, risk, free-wheeling markets and international trade — and nothing more than an illusion.

“We can’t afford another so- called economic expansion like the one from the last decade — what some call the ‘lost decade,’ ” Obama explained. The president went on to promise he would do all he could to stop any pesky so-called expansions in the future. And I believe him.

A recent poll shows that Obama is not alone in his aversion to the 2000s. According to a Pew Research Center poll, over 50 percent of American hold a negative view of the decade. Yet, the 2000s, like decades before it, are by nearly any measure — be it health, standard of living, the environment or technology — a success.

The average unemployment rate during this “lost decade” — including one of those unfortunate man-made disasters to the country’s financial center — was at 5.6 percent. One would think that the president — a man who believes a “jobs” bills that only saw unemployment go from nearly 8 percent to over 10 percent was a wild success — would be sort of impressed.

No. Obama tells us a real economic expansion will be based on legitimate, tangible, economic drivers like high-speed rail systems no one wants and government-subsidized “clean energy” nobody uses. (Trains and windmills? Could the ox-yoke- and-millstone sector be far behind?)

Which suckers are going to buy our solar panels? Free suckers, that’s who. According to Freedom House, a group that measures political rights and civil liberties around the world, during the “lost decade,” the percentage of the world’s population living in freedom climbed from 35 percent to nearly 46 percent. Leading the way was China.

So who did the president single out for populist scorn during his State of the Union speech? Not Iran. Not Saudi Arabia. Not Venezuela. That, I suspect, would be counterproductive and inflammatory. We’re not haters.

No, it was China, our second-leading trade partner.

Now, I’m not suggesting that the president prostrate himself in front of any Red Chinese tyrants — though chances are he will — only that he understand it’s free trade that brings peace to nations.

While China is headed in the right direction, our lot in life hasn’t been dreadful, either. Our “so-called” prosperity helped survival rates for cancer patients rise and deaths due to HIV and AIDS decrease. Life expectancy in the United States — even while we welcome immigrants from the poorest of nations — increased from 77 to 78.5 this decade, matching the percentage growth of the ’90s.

Meanwhile, teen pregnancy rates in the U.S. have declined dramatically and higher education enrollment has exploded, with 40 percent of adults between the ages of 18 to 24 enrolled in college. Our “so-called” prosperity saw the GDP rise from $9.7 trillion to $14 trillion the past decade.

Still, the Pew poll shows that 50 percent of Americans believe the 2000s were a real downer, while only 16 percent think the same of the ’70s. The ’70s! I suppose that since there is a good chance most of us will be reliving that wondrous decade in the coming years, those poll numbers might change.

None of this is to say we don’t have many genuine problems to deal with. Yet, with all our tribulations, the past 60 or so years (in a historic context) have seen unrivaled prosperity. Moreover, it’s prosperity that’s real.

As always, the state of the union will be just fine — if only our so-called leaders in Washington would let it be.

E-mail David Harsanyi at dharsanyi@denverpost.com.

RevContent Feed

More in ap