Looking down from her office window, she sees a young woman who has the manner and routine of a high-priced call girl. This she stores in her memory. When her husband says he missed his flight back to Toronto and she finds a disturbing photo on his iPhone, she goes to the hotel where she saw the girl, makes eye contact with her in a bar, contrives a conversation in the powder room. The girl, with perfect calm, explains that single women are not usually her clients. Couples, maybe.
Atom Egoyan finds intrigue at the edges of conventional sex. “Chloe,” like his great film “Exotica” (1994), is about sexual attraction confused by financial arrangements. It centers on a powerfully erotic young woman with personal motives that are hidden. It is not blatant but seductive, depending on the ways that our minds, more than our bodies, can be involved in a sexual relationship. It’s not so much what we’re doing as what I’m thinking about it — and what you’re thinking, which may be more complex than I realize.
Catherine Stewart (Julianne Moore) is a gynecologist, a successful one, judging by the house she inhabits fresh from the cover of Architectural Digest. Her husband, David (Liam Neeson), is an expert on opera. The call girl she saw from her window is Chloe (Amanda Seyfried), young, red-lipped, intelligent. Catherine explains to Chloe that she suspects her husband of adultery and wants to test if he would try to pick up another woman. She tells Chloe where her husband always has lunch.
Early in the film, talking with a patient uncertain about her sex life, Catherine explains that an orgasm is a simple muscular contraction, quite natural, nothing to be frightened of or make mysterious. Orgasms for Catherine, however, involve a great deal more than muscles, and a great deal depends on who they are experienced with, and why.
Chloe tells her about entering a cafe, boldly asking David if she can take the sugar from his table, and returning to her own. David understands that Chloe is not interested in sugar.
Chloe meets with Catherine to relate this encounter.
Chloe is good at this. She informs us early in the film that she is skilled at what she does. It’s not a matter of renting her body. She uses her intelligence to intuit what a client desires — really desires, no matter what the client might claim.
And she knows how to provide this in a way that will provoke curiosity, even fascination. Now she describes details to Catherine that do a great deal more than provoke a wife’s jealousy about her husband. They provoke an erotic curiosity about her husband.
Seyfried plays Chloe as a woman in command of her instrument — her body, which is for sale, and her mind, which works for itself. Moore undergoes a change she only believes is under her control. Neeson is an enigma to his wife and in a different way to us.
Egoyan follows his material to an ultimate conclusion.
After you see the movie, run through it again in your mind. Who wants what? Who gets what? Who decides what? Whose needs are gratified?
“Chloe”
R for strong sexual content including graphic dialogue, nudity and language. 1 hour, 36 minutes. Directed by Atom Egoyan. Screenplay Erin Cressida Wilson. Starring Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson, Amanda Seyfried, Max Thieriot. Opens today at the Mayan.
