WASHINGTON — A Pentagon inquiry into a Rolling Stone magazine profile of Gen. Stanley McChrystal that led to his dismissal as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan has cleared him of wrongdoing.
The probe’s results, released Monday, also called into question the accuracy of the magazine’s report last June, which anonymously quoted people around McChrystal making disparaging remarks about members of President Barack Obama’s national security team, including Vice President Joe Biden.
At the time he dismissed McChrystal, Obama said the general had fallen short of “the standard that should be set by a commanding general.”
The Defense Department inspector general’s report, however, concluded that available evidence did not support the conclusion that McChrystal had violated any applicable legal or ethics standard.
Last week, the White House tapped McChrystal to head a new advisory board to support military families, an initiative led by first lady Michelle Obama and Jill Biden, wife of the vice president. The selection of McChrystal was announced April 12, four days after the inspector general’s report was finished.
The conclusions of the report were first reported Monday by The New York Times, which obtained it under a Freedom of Information Act request. The Pentagon subsequently posted the report on its website.
The inspector general’s report said it reviewed an unpublished Army investigation of the case and interviewed numerous eyewitnesses.
The Pentagon inquiry also concluded that not all of the events at issue happened as reported in the Rolling Stone article.
“In some instances, we found no witnesses who acknowledged making or hearing the comments as reported,” the Pentagon said. “In other instances, we confirmed that the general substance of an incident at issue occurred, but not in the exact context described in the article.”
Rolling Stone issued a statement saying it stands behind its story, which it called “accurate in every detail.”
