WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court heard arguments over whether Los Angeles sheriff’s deputies went too far when they obtained a search warrant and seized all the guns from a home where a wanted violent gang member was thought to be living.
Usually, police officers are protected from lawsuits if they enter a home with a search warrant issued by a judge. But last year, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in an 8-3 decision, cleared the way for Detective Curt Messerschmidt to be sued for the raid on a house because it said he did not have probable cause to believe the suspect had a wide array of firearms.
That rationale did not sit well with most justices during Monday’s argument. They noted that the wanted suspect, Jerry Bowen, had threatened to kill his girlfriend and fired several shots at her with a sawed-off shotgun. He was also a member of the Mona Park Crips gang.
Justices Samuel Alito and Anthony Kennedy said a police officer would have good reason to seize all the firearms.
“What is wrong with a reasonable officer thinking: He’s tried to kill her in the past using one gun. He’s a member of a gang. He’s very likely to have other guns, and (they) may be found in the home where we believe he’s living?” Alito asked.
Moreover, said Chief Justice John Roberts, the deputy’s supervisor and a magistrate had approved the search warrant. Allowing the deputy to be sued for an overly broad search warrant “seems to me a pretty heavy burden to put on the cop on the beat,” Roberts said.
Bowen had lived with the Millender family as a foster child, but he was not there when the police carried out their predawn raid. He was later arrested at a nearby motel.
“The search terrified an innocent family and damaged their home” and sent 73-year-old Augusta Millender to the hospital, their lawyers told the court. She died during the summer when the case was pending, but her daughter has carried on the suit against the deputy sheriff.
The case of Messerschmidt vs. Millender brought together some strange bedfellows when it reached the Supreme Court. The American Civil Liberties Union, the National Rifle Association and the California Rifle and Pistol Association joined in supporting the Millenders, whose personal guns were seized. Meanwhile, the Obama administration joined with Los Angeles County in arguing for the suit to be dismissed.
The Fourth Amendment gives people a “right to be secure” in their homes and says “no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause … and particularly describing … the persons and things to be seized.” The 9th Circuit recited the words of the amendment in upholding the Millenders’ suit.
But the justices have been wary of allowing lawsuits against officers or federal agents who carry out a search approved by a magistrate.
Colo. case
