ap

Skip to content

Cory Gardner on Donald Trump’s meeting with Russian diplomats: “We simply have to have more information.”

The Colorado Republican last year introduced a bill that would deny security clearances to federal employees who showed ‘extreme carelessness’ with classified information

Senate Energy Subcommittee Chairman Sen. Cory ...
Zach Gibson, Getty Images
Senate Energy Subcommittee Chairman Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) speaks during a Senate Energy Subcommittee hearing discussing cybersecurity threats to the U.S. electrical grid and technology advancements to maximize such threats on Capitol Hill on March 28, 2017 in Washington, D.C.
DENVER, CO - JUNE 16: Denver Post's Washington bureau reporter Mark Matthews on Monday, June 16, 2014.  (Denver Post Photo by Cyrus McCrimmon)
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your player ready...

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner said Tuesday that the White House should be forthcoming about what happened last week when President Donald Trump met with Russian officials in the Oval Office — a conference in which Trump is said to have revealed classified information.

“There have been conflicting reports out of the White House,” said Gardner, R-Colo., when asked about in The Washington Post that said Trump shared sensitive information about the Islamic State.

“I think if they were reported accurately, itap a concern,” he added. “We have to have information. We simply have to have more information. Itap my understanding the Senate Intelligence Committee has requested that.”

The potential release of classified information has bothered Gardner before — though not with Trump.

Last year, he introduced a measure aimed at Hillary Clinton that would have revoked her security clearances after it was revealed she used a private server to handle emails while serving as U.S. Secretary of State.

His also called for , notably that “no officer or employee of the Federal Government who has exercised extreme carelessness in the handling of classified information may be granted a security clearance,” according to the measure.

Asked whether the current situation was similar, Gardner tried to draw a distinction. “That legislation was talking about a legal right, at the time that was the issue — somebody who had a legal right to the information,” he said.

Though he was opposed to Clinton, Gardner never has been a big Trump fan. Last year he called on Trump to and said he wouldn’t vote for him.

RevContent Feed

More in Related News