ap

Skip to content

David Lesh, influencer behind social media stunt at Keystone, calls case “outlandish” after appeals court throws out part of conviction

Appeals court overturns charge related to unauthorized work activity on national forest land, but says trespassing-related charge stands

David Lesh enters the federal courthouse in Grand Junction after a trial break on Aug. 5, 2021. A judge found Lesh guilty of two petty offenses, one of which was overturned by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. (McKenzie Lange/Grand Junction Sentinel archive)
McKenzie Lange, Grand Junction Sentinel
David Lesh enters the federal courthouse in Grand Junction after a trial break on Aug. 5, 2021. A judge found Lesh guilty of two petty offenses, one of which was overturned by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. (McKenzie Lange/Grand Junction Sentinel archive)
PUBLISHED:
Getting your player ready...

A social media content creator applauded a July 16 ruling that overturned a criminal charge against him, saying the case was based on outlandish claims that would have set a dangerous precedent.

David Lesh, owner of outerwear company Virtika, was convicted on two charges in 2022 after he made a post on his personal account that depicted an individual snowmobiling over a jump in a terrain park at Keystone Resort when the property was closed. The U.S. government charged him with trespassing and conducting unauthorized work activity on national forest land.

A district court concluded that Lesh was “taking photographs to promote a clothing line, which is unquestionably work activity,” according to court documents. But Lesh challenged the rulings, and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, on July 16, agreed with his arguments related to the unauthorized work activity crime, saying Lesh’s conviction “must be reversed” because “the regulation does not fairly warn social media users that posting images on the internet could constitute a federal crime with imprisonment up to six months.”

Lesh, in an interview following the Tenth Circuit decision, said he agreed that such a charge cannot stand in this day and age.

Read more at .

RevContent Feed

More in Courts