ap

Skip to content

Hunting and fishing are a part of Colorado’s way of life (ap)

Initiative 302 would guarantee the right to hunt and fish in Colorado

Denver resident Bill Bonebrake fishes for trout on an ice-free South Platte River on Wednesday, March 4, 2026, in Douglas County, just north of Deckers, Colo. Bonebrake was having a productive day on the river, having pulled in two 18-inch rainbow trout, four brown trout, and numerous smaller rainbows. (Photo by Timothy Hurst/The Denver Post)
Denver resident Bill Bonebrake fishes for trout on an ice-free South Platte River on Wednesday, March 4, 2026, in Douglas County, just north of Deckers, Colo. Bonebrake was having a productive day on the river, having pulled in two 18-inch rainbow trout, four brown trout, and numerous smaller rainbows. (Photo by Timothy Hurst/The Denver Post)
PUBLISHED:
Getting your player ready...

It might surprise some to know I don’t eat meat every day. Beans are cheaper, and I have a ready supply of eggs from my hens. More importantly, I’m working to eliminate from my diet meat from industrial farms where animals live short lives caged in crowded, sunless concrete and steel.

A few times a week, I reach into the deep freezer for locally sourced beef, fish, or game meat. I’m grateful for the nourishment deer, elk, antelope, and wild fowl provide and for the hunter friends who donate the meat. One of several reasons I am voting for the is to protect the ability of these Colorado hunters and anglers to put meat on the supper table.

Colorado’s 300,000 hunters and 950,000 anglers don’t just provide sustenance for their families and friends; they benefit the state in other ways. In addition to providing $3.25 billion in economic impact and support for thousands of jobs, hunting and fishing fund wildlife conservation through licenses, tags, and taxes, and help the state manage wild animal populations.

Without management, game species are vulnerable to starvation and disease – nature’s way of population control. The initiative does not forbid the use of secondary management tools like relocation and birth control; it just ensures that hunting and fishing remain the preferred means of responsible management.

In fact, the initiative does not limit the authority of Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) or the General Assembly to regulate hunting and fishing “for sound scientific wildlife conservation and management, public safety, or to preserve the future of hunter and fishing opportunities for all species statewide.” They will continue to determine seasons, number of licenses and other licensing requirements and safety guidelines. Trespassing on private property or the hunting of non-game species, endangered species, or any species prohibited by federal law will still be illegal.

Colorado isn’t the only state considering adopting such an amendment at this time. The Oregon Attorney General began drafting a similar initiative after voters turned in the requisite number of signatures. Earlier this year, activists threatened to introduce a measure to criminalize hunting and fishing.

While activists have not threatened to directly eliminate fishing and hunting, groups representing sportsmen and women in Colorado are worried the CPW Commission, the governor-appointed citizen board that oversees the agency’s policies over parks and wildlife, could favor activists’ interests in the future over those of hunters and fishermen and women depending on who is appointed.

During the last session, a Colorado Senate committee refused to confirm two of the governor’s appointees to the sportsmen-designated seats because of such concerns. What will happen if the chamber doesn’t do its due diligence next time? A constitutional amendment is needed to ensure that Colorado fishermen and women and hunters continue to have a seat at the table.

Rick Enstrom, who served eight years on the CPW commission and three terms as chairman, told me he is concerned: “Generations of families that hunt and fish for enjoyment and sustenance have been backed into a corner by nameless, faceless political newcomers opposed to this traditional lifestyle.”

My friend is voting for the amendment not just to preserve the tradition of hunting and fishing for the future, but to maintain funding provided by hunters and anglers for conservation, and to ensure “wildlife in Colorado is properly managed by biologists and professionals.”

I will be joining him. Some of my fondest childhood memories with my dad are of hunting pheasant and fishing for trout. I, too, want to ensure the next generation will have the same opportunities. In the meantime, this amendment will protect me, even though I neither hunt or fish (I’m terrible at it), as I ditch factory farms for ethical and sustainable sources of sustenance.

Krista Kafer is a Sunday Denver Post columnist.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.

More in ap Columnists