Washington – Amid new questions about President Bush’s drive to topple Saddam Hussein, several House Democrats urged lawmakers on Thursday to conduct an official inquiry to determine whether the president intentionally misled Congress.
At a public forum where the word “impeachment” loomed large, Exhibit A was the so- called Downing Street memo, a prewar document leaked from inside the British government to The Sunday Times of London a month and a half ago.
Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, organized the event.
Recounting a meeting of Prime Minister Tony Blair’s national security team, the memo says the Bush administration believed that war was inevitable and was determined to use intelligence about weapons of mass destruction to justify the ouster of Hussein.
“The intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy,” one of the participants was quoted as saying at the meeting, which took place just after British officials returned from Washington.
The president “may have deliberately deceived the United States to get us into a war,” Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said. “Was the president of the United States a fool or a knave?”
“We have not been told the truth,” Cindy Sheehan, whose soldier son was killed in Baghdad a year ago, told the Democrats. “If this administration doesn’t have anything to hide, they should be down here testifying.”
The White House refuses to respond to a May 5 letter from 122 congressional Democrats about whether there was a coordinated effort to “fix” the intelligence and facts around the policy, as the Downing Street memo says.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan says Conyers “is simply trying to rehash old debates.”
“Quite frankly,” said Rep. Charles Rangel of New York, senior Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, “evidence that appears to be building up points to whether or not the president has deliberately misled Congress to make the most important decision a president has to make: going to war.”
Misleading Congress is an impeachable offense, a point that Rangel underscored by saying he already has been through the impeachment of President Clinton and the Watergate hearings that led to President Nixon’s resignation.
