Washington – The Supreme Court debated the rights of inventors Wednesday, weighing in on a dispute between eBay and a small Virginia patent holder.
The case’s outcome could mean millions of dollars for inventors working in their garages or in large pharmaceutical labs – including those who develop a product and those who opt only to patent ideas.
The dispute between eBay, the Web-based marketplace, and MercExchange is one of several high-profile legal battles that are calling attention to the nation’s patent laws, which some critics – including Amazon.com, Yahoo and Xerox Corp. – say need updating to keep up with rapidly changing technology.
Justices won’t decide whether eBay stole MercExchange’s idea for selling goods over an electronic network. Rather, the high court is being asked whether trial judges must automatically issue orders prohibiting use of an idea after juries find a patent violation.
EBay and other high-tech companies warn that patent- holding companies could use the threat of court injunctions to coerce larger firms into settling lawsuits for huge sums.
Lawyers for the two sides traded barbs in front of justices, with MercExchange accusing eBay of stealing its idea for selling goods in cyberspace and eBay calling the Virginia firm a “patent troll,” a company that hoards patents for products it never develops.
