WASHINGTON — The country’s leading regulator of everyday consumer items is embroiled in an increasingly nasty ideological battle over the role of government oversight that is being fought on the terrain of toys, cribs and other products.
With the Consumer Product Safety Commission split along party lines, the partisan paralysis that has crippled Washington’s ability to balance its budget and fix the economy now threatens to spread to the more prosaic business of government: assuring that roughly 15,000 products are reasonably safe to use.
Democratic and Republican commissioners alike say they are seeking to protect consumers, millions of whom are injured each year by items under the agency’s purview. But Democrats say the GOP commissioners consistently put the financial interest of business ahead of consumer safety, while Republicans say the Democrats often rush to regulate without assessing whether the safety benefits outweigh the costs.
This dispute, which has its roots in a 3-year-old law that empowered the commission to become more aggressive, has been taking a particularly bitter and personal cast. In August, commission chairman Inez Tenenbaum, a Democrat, accused her Republican colleagues in a Huffington Post opinion piece of “delay and distortion.” The Republicans blasted Tenenbaum for what they call her “radical agenda,” and even accused the majority of “regulatory malpractice” on one particularly heated issue.
Now, with the recent departure of Democrat Thomas Moore after 16 years on the board, the panel is split evenly down the middle and facing the prospect of complete gridlock.
The acrimony grows out of changes brought about in 2008, when Congress adopted the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, the most significant legislative change for the agency since its creation nearly four decades ago. Prompted by a string of high-profile recalls of lead-laden and defective toys, that legislation called on the agency to crank out a series of new rules under rigorous deadlines.
