ap

Skip to content
A Central Japan Railway Co. Shinkansen bullet train passes through Odawara Station, in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, on Monday, Jan. 25, 2010. Central Japan Railway Co., the owner of the nation's largest bullet-train maker, aims to sell high-speed trains in U.S. states including California and Texas as it strives to boost overseas sales.
A Central Japan Railway Co. Shinkansen bullet train passes through Odawara Station, in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, on Monday, Jan. 25, 2010. Central Japan Railway Co., the owner of the nation’s largest bullet-train maker, aims to sell high-speed trains in U.S. states including California and Texas as it strives to boost overseas sales.
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your player ready...

PHILADELPHIA  — Can you have a European- or Japanese-style high-speed rail experience, even if the train is creeping along at less than 150 mph?

Yes, say international manufacturers who are touting the prospects of smooth, quiet, luxurious rides for American passengers, even though it will be many years, even decades, before 220-mph bullet trains show up in the United States.

“Higher-speed” trains with many of the same aerodynamic features and interior amenities of France’s TGV or Japan’s Shinkansen may be the American stepping-stone to true high-speed rail, as the United States looks for affordable improvements to its old-fashioned, slow passenger rail network.

Foreign-based high-speed train-builders, such as Alstom (France), Siemens (Germany), and Talgo (Spain), have opened American factories to make modern trains that can run on conventional tracks in the United States, with hopes of eventually winning high-speed contracts, as well.

Many of the manufacturers were in Philadelphia this month, showing their wares at the eighth World Congress on High-Speed Rail.

“We are bringing technology from Europe to the U.S. and engineering it here,” said Stephen Robillard, vice president of high-speed rail for Siemens. Siemens hopes to sell its RailJet, capable of running at 160 mph, for use on existing American routes.

“It’s a whole different comfort level than anything in the U.S. now,” said Robillard, citing first-, business- and coach-class sections; smoother rides; lighter-weight construction; and plush interiors. “It’s such a step up from what you have today that it really is a game-changer.”

Siemens’ main American factory is in Sacramento, Calif., where the company now builds light-rail vehicles for U.S. transit agencies, as well as 70 new 125-mph electric locomotives for Amtrak to use on the Northeast Corridor, starting next year. The company has purchased 28 acres adjacent to the factory to accommodate possible high-speed construction.

Alstom has a train factory in Hornell, N.Y., that makes and refurbishes railcars. It could also be the home of future high-speed train construction.

“We’re taking the incremental approach,” said Alstom spokesman Timothy Brown. “You have to get out of the all-or-nothing mode.”

Brown said the “aesthetic experience” of traveling on lighter, quieter, sleeker trains, even at a mere 110 to 125 mph, could build support in the United States for true high-speed trains, those traveling up to 220 mph.

“If you bring that service to the U.S., you let the idea show itself,” he said.

But changes in the political winds can imperil even the incremental approach, as the Spanish trainmaker Talgo learned in Wisconsin.

Talgo has begun laying off workers at its new Milwaukee factory, after Republican leaders in the legislature, with the support of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, decided to mothball two new, 14-car Talgo trains rather than pay for a new maintenance base for the trains, which were to travel between Milwaukee and Chicago.

“We definitely feel we were scapegoats for politics in Wisconsin,” said Talgo America vice president Nora Friend. “But we’re still committed to the United States, despite what happened in Wisconsin.”

RevContent Feed

More in Business