ap

Skip to content

Keenesburg’s Wild Animal Sanctuary sues developer over homes slated for the animal haven’s doorstep

Sanctuary wants judge to force Wigaard Smith Estates to abide by 2010 agreement

Oden the African Lion, top, and his sister Tsylia, both rescued from Ukraine, at The Wild Animal Sanctuary in Keenesburg, Colorado Friday, Aug. 09, 2024. His sister, Tsylia, left, walks past. Cats Aren’t Trophies and The Wild Life Sanctuary held a behind the scenes tour and press conference celebrating a successful campaign to put a ban of mountain lion hunting and bobcat trapping on the ballot this fall. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)
Oden the African Lion, top, and his sister Tsylia, both rescued from Ukraine, at The Wild Animal Sanctuary in Keenesburg, Colorado Friday, Aug. 09, 2024. His sister, Tsylia, left, walks past. Cats Aren’t Trophies and The Wild Life Sanctuary held a behind the scenes tour and press conference celebrating a successful campaign to put a ban of mountain lion hunting and bobcat trapping on the ballot this fall. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)
DENVER, CO - OCTOBER 2:  Staff portraits at the Denver Post studio.  (Photo by Eric Lutzens/The Denver Post)
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your player ready...

A few months after a fight between The Wild Animal Sanctuary and a home developer blew into the open this spring, the Keenesburg animal rehab haven has filed suit claiming that a years-old agreement designed to keep harmony between new exurban homeowners and a collection of nearly 1,000 lions, tigers and bears next door was violated.

In a lawsuit filed Friday in Weld County District Court, the 45-year-old wild animal sanctuary accused Wigaard Smith Estates, the developer, of breaching a 2010 agreement that required the construction of an eight-foot privacy fence and provision of an eight-foot protective buffer between the sanctuary and new homes.

It also gave the sanctuary a seat on the homeowners association so that potential impacts could be clearly communicated with future homeowners who would be living in a “medium-density residential subdivision in the middle of a rural area with the Sanctuary on three sides and a farm on the other.”

“TWAS’s concerns was and is that people would buy property in the proposed Development with no idea of the practical challenges from being next door to the world’s largest concentration of predatory animals, and that buyers taking without notice of those challenges would significantly increase — if not guarantee — friction with TWAS and, likely, litigation — to the detriment of TWAS and its critical zoological and ecological mission,” The Wild Animal Sanctuary wrote in its suit, referring to itself with an acronym.

Pat Craig, executive director of the animal sanctuary, stirring up outrage over the building plans. The developers, Sherry Wigaard and Velois Smith, said at the time that their lives were being threatened by supporters of the sanctuary.

“I’m 75 years old, and I’m getting bullied,” Wigaard told The Denver Post in May. “Itap devastating.”

The sanctuary is asking for a “permanent injunction” on construction going forward until Wigaard Smith Estates fully complies with the terms of the 15-year-old agreement.

RevContent Feed

More in Courts